🔗 Share this article

Families whose relatives laid to rest in resting places vulnerable to coastal erosion argue that a lack of decision over how to tackle the issue is causing them avoidable anguish concerning the eternal homes of their departed family.

A Looming Threat to Ancient Churchyards

The council have singled out three burial grounds in the villages of Happisburgh, Mundesley, and Trimingham as being in danger of being engulfed by the sea in the next few generations.

A recent report on the situation details a range of options, from taking no action to disinterring bodies and reburying them in more secure sites. Authorities maintain it is for the community to determine how to move forward.

“Right now we’re in a state of uncertainty. It upsets me. My parents wanted this to serve as their final resting place, but it won't be because of the encroaching sea.”

Projections suggest at least part of one graveyard could be claimed by the sea in the next 80 years, but some residents worry it will happen much sooner. “In my view it’s got under 20 years, if you look at what’s happened in the last 30 years,” a farmer stated.

Haunted by the Ghosts of Eccles

A local business owner remembered a school trip to the nearby settlement of Eccles, which has largely vanished into the sea, along with its church and graveyard.

“It was possible to see human remains,” she said. “Some have this idealized notion that people’s remains will just get washed out to sea. That is not the case. Individuals will collect remains as souvenirs and go plundering graves looking for valuables. It’s completely disrespectful.”

“I’m worried that the identical fate that happened at Eccles will occur here and there’ll be skeletons on the shore. I’d be appalled by that.”

A Soldier's Grave in Jeopardy

Further up the shoreline lies the burial plot of a former paratrooper who died while serving abroad. His mother said she lost sleep after discovering her child's grave might one day be relocated.

“It does disturb me to consider this won’t be his lasting resting place,” she said. “For us it’s an significant place to go.”

She believes, new burials should cease but says it is premature to disturb current plots. “My preference for now is to take no action and watch carefully, but an early decision needs to be made when a critical moment has been attained.”

Searching for Solutions and Certainty

An absence of agreement over the timing and method to handle the problem has resulted in bereaved families feeling frustrated and anxious.

Several families are calling for more sea defences to delay the unavoidable loss and to permit funerals to proceed for now. Different voices contend the time for moving graves is approaching.

“The situation is very emotive,” a family member stated. “The official study was really good, but now there’s uncertainty about how it is taken forward. And everybody is washing their hands over who is responsible.”

A coastal manager confirmed the burial sites were under the care of the church authorities. “Ultimately it is up to them to choose the path to take. Our role is here to assist them through that journey with residents.”

It was also stated there was ample time to consider all the choices. “This concerns decades before it starts to be lost.”

“Currently, there exists no unified opinion on what should happen yet. We need good local conversations to discover the right answers for each village.”

The possibility of the loss of the churches and graveyards was described as one of “immense sadness for the area,” but faith leaders also spoke of a belief in resurrection, offering a theological perspective on the temporal loss of sacred ground.